Locked History Actions

Diff for "PDB/PDBparser"

Differences between revisions 3 and 20 (spanning 17 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 3 as of 2017-06-27 09:27:28 →
Size: 6755
Editor: AlinaWroblewska
Comment:
← Revision 20 as of 2018-10-05 15:18:42 → ⇥
Size: 7127
Editor: AlinaWroblewska
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
= PDBparser = = PDB-based dependency parsing models for Polish =
Line 4: Line 4:
PDBparser is a Polish dependency parser trained on the current version of ([[http://zil.ipipan.waw.pl/PDB|Polish Depedency Bank]]) with the publicly available parsing systems – [[http://maltparser.org|MaltParser]] or [[https://code.google.com/archive/p/mate-tools/|MateParser]]. `MaltParser` is a transition-based dependency parser that uses a deterministic parsing algorithm. The deterministic parsing algorithm builds a dependency structure of an input sentence based on transitions (shift-reduce actions) predicted by a classifier. The classifier learns to predict the next transition given training data and the parse history. `MateParser`, in turn, is a graph-based parser that defines a space of well-formed candidate dependency trees for an input sentence, scores them given an induced parsing model, and selects the highest scoring dependency tree as a correct analysis of the input sentence. The PDB-based models are trained on the current version of [[http://zil.ipipan.waw.pl/PDB|Polish Depedency Bank]] with the publicly available parsing systems – [[https://github.com/360er0/COMBO|COMBO]], [[https://code.google.com/archive/p/mate-tools/|MateParser]] and [[http://maltparser.org|MaltParser]]. /* ''MaltParser'' is a transition-based dependency parser that uses a deterministic parsing algorithm. The deterministic parsing algorithm builds a dependency structure of an input sentence based on transitions (shift-reduce actions) predicted by a classifier. The classifier learns to predict the next transition given training data and the parse history. `MateParser`, in turn, is a graph-based parser that defines a space of well-formed candidate dependency trees for an input sentence, scores them given an induced parsing model, and selects the highest scoring dependency tree as a correct analysis of the input sentence. */
Line 6: Line 6:
== Dependency parsing models for Polish == == PDB-based models ==
Line 8: Line 8:
 * `MateParser` model for Polish: [[attachment:170608_PDBMate.mdl]]
 * `MaltParser` model for Polish: [[attachment:170608_PDBMalt.mco]]		 === COMBO ===
 * '''NEW!''' PDB-based COMBO model compatible with the tagset of Morfeusz 2: [[attachment:180912_PDBCOMBO.pkl]]
Line 11: Line 11:
The dependency parsing models for Polish are released under the GNU General Public License v3 (GPL v.3) and by downloading it you accept the conditions of that licence. === MateParser ===

 * '''NEW!''' PDB-based Mate model compatible with the tagset of Morfeusz 2: [[attachment:180322_PDBMate.mdl]]
 * PDB-based Mate model compatible with the tagset of Morfeusz: [[attachment:170608_PDBMate.mdl]]

=== MaltParser ===

 * '''NEW!''' PDB-based MaltParser model compatible with the tagset of Morfeusz 2: [[attachment:180322_PDBMalt.mco]]
 * PDB-basd MaltParser model compatible with the tagset of Morfeusz: [[attachment:170608_PDBMalt.mco]]

= PDBUD-based dependency parsing models for Polish=

=== UDPipe ===
 * UDPipe model for Polish: [[attachment:180606_PDBUDPipe.udpipe]]
Line 14: Line 27:
Line 17: Line 31:
|| `Polish MateParser` || 0.85 || 0.91 ||
|| `Polish MaltParser` || 0.84 || 0.89 ||		 || `PDBMate` || 0.85 || 0.89 ||
|| `PDBMalt` || 0.82 || 0.86 ||
Line 26: Line 40:
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">abbrev_punct ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.97 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.98 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.98 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.96 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.98 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.97 ||
||adjunct || 0.88 || 0.76 || 0.84 || 0.79 || 0.82 || 0.78 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">adjunct_qt ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.81 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.27 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.25 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.20 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.39 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.23 ||
||aglt || 0.98 || 0.98 || 0.98 || 0.98 || 0.98 || 0.98 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">app ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.70 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.58 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.59 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.47 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.64 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.51 ||
||aux || 0.94 || 0.92 || 0.97 || 0.92 || 0.96 || 0.92 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">comp ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.91 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.88 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.88 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.85 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.89 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.86 ||
||comp_ag || 0.93 || 0.90 || 0.95 || 0.90 || 0.94 || 0.90 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">comp_fin ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.77 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.61 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.80 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.71 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.79 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.66 ||
||comp_inf || 0.93 || 0.90 || 0.93 || 0.90 || 0.93 || 0.90 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">complm ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.89 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.86 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.83 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.83 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.88 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.84 ||
||cond || 0.98 || 0.97 || 0.97 || 0.97 || 0.98 || 0.97 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">conjunct ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.84 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.74 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.81 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.72 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.82 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.73 ||
||coord || 0.65 || 0.51 || 0.66 || 0.52 || 0.65 || 0.52 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">coord_punct ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.58 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.38 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.55 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.48 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.56 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.42 ||
||imp || 1.0 || 1.00 || 0.91 || 0.74 || 0.95 || 0.85 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">item ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.77 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.62 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.51 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.51 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.61 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.56 ||
||mwe || 0.95 || 0.87 || 0.88 || 0.80 || 0.91 || 0.84 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">ne ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.85 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.79 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.69 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.58 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.76 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.67 ||
||neg || 0.98 || 0.98 || 0.98 || 0.99 || 0.93 || 0.98 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">obj ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.88 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.81 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.91 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.88 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.89 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.84 ||
||obj_th || 0.83 || 0.79 || 0.76 || 0.68 || 0.79 || 0.73 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">pd ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.90 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.80 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.84 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.78 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.87 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.79 ||
||pre_coord || 0.88 || 0.85 || 0.90 || 0.57 || 0.89 || 0.68 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">pred ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.94 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.88 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.94 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.88 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.94 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.88 ||
||punct || 0.87 || 0.81 || 0.89 || 0.81 || 0.88 || 0.81 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">refl ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.98 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.97 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.98 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.97 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.98 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.97 ||
||subj || 0.91 || 0.87 || 0.92 || 0.86 || 0.92 || 0.86 ||		 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">abbrev_punct ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.99 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.99 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.98 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.97 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.98 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.98 ||
||adjunct || 0.89 || 0.73 || 0.92 || 0.77 || 0.82 || 0.75 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">adjunct_qt ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.74 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.51 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.76 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.58 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.75 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.55 ||
||aglt || 1.00 || 0.98 || 1.00 || 0.98 || 0.98 || 0.98 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">app ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.75 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.58 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.69 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.52 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.72 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.55 ||
||aux || 0.95 || 0.90 || 0.97 || 0.92 || 0.96 || 0.91 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">comp ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.90 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.85 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.87 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.82 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.88 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.84 ||
||comp_ag || 0.95 || 0.90 || 0.96 || 0.91 || 0.94 || 0.90 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">comp_fin ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.87 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.75 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.86 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.79 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.87 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.77 ||
||comp_inf || 0.95 || 0.91 || 0.96 || 0.90 || 0.93 || 0.90 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> cond ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 1.00 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.97 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 1.00 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.96 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 1.00 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.96 ||
||conjunct || 0.85 || 0.71 || 0.82 || 0.65 || 0.82 || 0.68 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> imp ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.98 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.97 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.91 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.87 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.94 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.92 ||
|| item || 0.87 || 0.4 || 0.73 || 0.37 || 0.61 || 0.39 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> mwe ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.90 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.83 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.83 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.75 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.87 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.79 ||
||ne || 0.87 || 0.78 || 0.73 || 0.64 || 0.76 || 0.70 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> neg ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.99 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.97 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 1.00 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.98 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.99 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.98 ||
||obj || 0.89 || 0.81 || 0.91 || 0.86 || 0.89 || 0.83 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> obj_th ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.83 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.76 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.76 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.65 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.80 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.70 ||
||pd || 0.86 || 0.77 || 0.80 || 0.72 || 0.87 || 0.74 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> pre_coord ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.86 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.76 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.78 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.55 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.82 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.64 ||
||punct || 0.97 || 0.75 || 0.98 || 0.76 || 0.88 || 0.76 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">refl ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.99 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.96 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.99 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.96 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.99 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.96 ||
||root || 0.91 || 0.80 || 0.91 || 0.81 || 0.94 ||0.80 ||
||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> subj ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.94||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.84 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.94 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.83 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff">0.94 ||<bgcolor="#eef3ff"> 0.84 ||
Line 56: Line 67:
The performance of !MaltParser model for Polish may be tested in Multiservice NLP – [[http://multiservice.nlp.ipipan.waw.pl]].
To parse a Polish text in Multiservice "select predefined chain of actions": 3: Pantera, `DependencyParser`, input your text, and press the button "Run".		  * The performance of !MaltParser model for Polish may be tested in Multiservice NLP – [[http://multiservice.nlp.ipipan.waw.pl]].
 * To parse a Polish text in Multiservice "Select predefined chain of actions": 5: Concraft, DependencyParser, input your text, and press the button "Run".
 * To download the parser's output in CoNLL format, "Select output format:":
Line 60: Line 72:
<<BibMate(key, "wrob:14", omitYears=true)>> <<BibMate(key, "wro:14", omitYears=true)>>
Line 63: Line 75:
<<BibMate(key, "awmw:deparsing", omitYears=true)>> <<BibMate(key, "awmw:departing", omitYears=true)>>
Line 66: Line 78:
== Contact == === Licensing ===

The dependency parsing models for Polish are released under the [[https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/|CC BY-NC-SA 4.0]] licence and by downloading it you accept the conditions of that licence.

=== Contact ===

PDB-based dependency parsing models for Polish

The PDB-based models are trained on the current version of Polish Depedency Bank with the publicly available parsing systems – COMBO, MateParser and MaltParser.

PDB-based models

COMBO

MateParser

MaltParser

= PDBUD-based dependency parsing models for Polish=

UDPipe

Parsing performance

10-fold cross-validation (avg.)

Model

LAS

UAS

PDBMate

0.85

0.89

PDBMalt

0.82

0.86

Precision, recall and f-score of individual dependency relations (avg.)

The description of Polish dependency relations types is available on Polish dependency relation types.

Dependency relation type

Precision

Recall

F-Measure

Mate

Malt

Mate

Malt

Mate

Malt

abbrev_punct

0.99

0.99

0.98

0.97

0.98

0.98

adjunct

0.89

0.73

0.92

0.77

0.82

0.75

adjunct_qt

0.74

0.51

0.76

0.58

0.75

0.55

aglt

1.00

0.98

1.00

0.98

0.98

0.98

app

0.75

0.58

0.69

0.52

0.72

0.55

aux

0.95

0.90

0.97

0.92

0.96

0.91

comp

0.90

0.85

0.87

0.82

0.88

0.84

comp_ag

0.95

0.90

0.96

0.91

0.94

0.90

comp_fin

0.87

0.75

0.86

0.79

0.87

0.77

comp_inf

0.95

0.91

0.96

0.90

0.93

0.90

cond

1.00

0.97

1.00

0.96

1.00

0.96

conjunct

0.85

0.71

0.82

0.65

0.82

0.68

imp

0.98

0.97

0.91

0.87

0.94

0.92

item

0.87

0.4

0.73

0.37

0.61

0.39

mwe

0.90

0.83

0.83

0.75

0.87

0.79

ne

0.87

0.78

0.73

0.64

0.76

0.70

neg

0.99

0.97

1.00

0.98

0.99

0.98

obj

0.89

0.81

0.91

0.86

0.89

0.83

obj_th

0.83

0.76

0.76

0.65

0.80

0.70

pd

0.86

0.77

0.80

0.72

0.87

0.74

pre_coord

0.86

0.76

0.78

0.55

0.82

0.64

punct

0.97

0.75

0.98

0.76

0.88

0.76

refl

0.99

0.96

0.99

0.96

0.99

0.96

root

0.91

0.80

0.91

0.81

0.94

0.80

subj

0.94

0.84

0.94

0.83

0.94

0.84

Dependency parser integrated into Multiservice NLP for Polish

  • The performance of MaltParser model for Polish may be tested in Multiservice NLP – http://multiservice.nlp.ipipan.waw.pl.

  • To parse a Polish text in Multiservice "Select predefined chain of actions": 5: Concraft, DependencyParser, input your text, and press the button "Run".

  • To download the parser's output in CoNLL format, "Select output format:":

Publications

List of publications

Alina Wróblewska. Polish Dependency Parser Trained on an Automatically Induced Dependency Bank. Ph.D. dissertation, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, 2014.

List of publications

Alina Wróblewska and Adam Przepiórkowski. Projection-based annotation of a Polish dependency treebank. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Hrafn Loftsson, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk, and Stelios Piperidis, editors, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2014, pages 2306–2312, Reykjavík, Iceland, 2014. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).

List of publications

Alina Wróblewska. Polish dependency bank. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 7(1), 2012.
List of publications

Licensing

The dependency parsing models for Polish are released under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 licence and by downloading it you accept the conditions of that licence.

Contact

Any questions, comments? Please send them to <alina AT SPAMFREE ipipan DOT waw DOT pl>.

last edited 2022-09-09 07:00:19 by AlinaWroblewska